Skip Links.Accessibility.Help.Contact Us
Images of Sheffield
Urban Design

Part 6: Tools and Applications

Design Competitions

Sheffield city centre offers a number of opportunities where the promotion of national and international design competitions would be an appropriate way of raising design expectations and the interest of professionals and the public. Design competitions have in the past been effective in raising the quality in the urban design debate and had an influence on the enhancement of the civic reputation of the locality, for example:

  • Paris has for many years pursued a policy of procuring the design of major public buildings and urban spaces through an international competition process. This has been championed at the highest political levels and has added immeasurably to national prestige as well as attracting to the city a whole new generation of cultural tourists;

  • The Austrian city of Gratz offers a good example of how a city of a smaller scale can use the competition process to help establish an internationally recognised programme of architectural excellence. The city’s achievements lead to its selection as European City of Culture 2003.

Design competitions can be organised directly by public authorities, private developers or a partnership of both. Many clients or promoters employ an experienced independent agency such as the RIBA to organise and conduct the process but ultimately, the process is driven by the requirements of the client group. The main requirements, if the best design talent is to be attracted, is to have a clear brief and a completely fair and transparent process.

The RIBA offers advice on a variety of standard competitive processes which can be followed when trying to find the right architect design solution for a development site. These include:

  • Open Ideas Competition: This process allows the identification of a broad range of design solutions based on a conceptual brief provided by the client. Various solutions can be explored without a commitment to build.

  • Competitive Interview: This will enable the developer to find the right architect or design team. A variety of consultants are invited to submit an expression of interest based on the tender brief. At this stage a broad project brief and a commitment to build is required.

  • Open Project Competition: This aims to find a design solution. It involves a two stage process which in the first instance is open to all registered professionals who would submit a detailed project brief and a commitment to build. It would then be short-listed until the right design team and solution for the development site have been selected.

  • Invited Competition: In this scenario the client selects a short-list of potential architects to find the best design solution for the development site. These architects submit a detailed project brief and the most suitable candidate is chosen based in their entry.

Other forms of competition frequently used at the moment are Design and Build and procurement by PFI/PPP, where design is a part only of the competitive submission, alongside cost and the offer of other services. In some cases this approach has proved useful to emphasise the primacy of design and quality of product but generally, the cost and transfer of development risk are judged to be of greater importance. It is therefore difficult to visualise how this method of procurement will be effective in promoting the quality aspired to in the Compendium unless there is positive discrimination in favour of design content.

It is not the intention that these processes are viewed as rigid rules of the competition process. Sheffield City Council and other potential client groups are encouraged to adapt and/or combine these approaches to suit the requirements of the client group and the project site.

In Sheffield local design competitions should be encouraged to showcase new talent and provide an opportunity for debate and dialogue amongst the general public. Given the right project and an inspiring brief, design competitions can provide a context for experimentation and innovation which often have spin-off benefits for other sectors of the community.

< Previous | Top | Next >